WHO rejects claims of China bias | Coronavirus | WHO

WHO rejects claims of China bias | Coronavirus  | WHO 

WHO rejects claims of China bias | Coronavirus News | WHO

now the World Health Organization has rejected claims of China bias after US President Donald Trump cut its funding saying that it backed Beijing's disinformation push and delete to warn the rest of the world about the outbreak WHS chief doctor dr. tetris kappa racist said that the organization regretted the funding cut he said that the organization is working its international partners to fill any financial gap that when we divided the virus exploits the cracks between us we are committed to serving the world's people and to accountability for the resources with which we are entrusted in due course WHS  erformance in tackling this pandemic will be reviewed by WHS  ember states and the independent bodies that are in place to ensure transparency and accountability for that matter involving all responders this is part of the usual process put in place by our member states no doubt areas for improvement will be identified and there will be lessons for all of us to learn but for now our focus my focus is on stopping this virus and saving lives the United States is the biggest overall donor to the geneva-based organization last year America's contribution of more than 400 million dollars accounted for 15% of the w-h-o s budget Trump says that the funding is suspended pending a review of the whe OHS handling of the pandemic meanwhile the American Medical Association has urged Donald Trump to reconsider the funding cut saying that w-h-o plays a crucial role in adding health workers in poor nations well certainly from the AMAs perspective we are looking at this from the perspective public health and the science and the evidence the World Health Organization has purchased and reputed mass the n95 mask they have purchased and distributed test kits of her countries and certainly they are engaged in vaccine trials that are taking place around the globe and so you know credible concerns absolutely can be raised but right now from the public health perspective we believe that the president should reconsider his to sit into health funding for the World Health Organization